Digital planner stickers goodnotes9/1/2023 ![]() ![]() Now that you’ve found a few different stickers that you like to use in your planner, you can take it one step further and create your own virtual sticker book in the app. ![]() A Goodnotes collection file is included! Taking it further You can use them in Goodnotes, Notability, or Noteshelf. There are 16 different stickers in 6 different colours. Where to get free digital stickers for Goodnotes?Ĭlick here to download a free set of basic shapes digital stickers. You’ll then have a sticker that you can adjust to the desired size on the page. Move the cursor to surround the image you want as a sticker, and then click ‘Done’. You’ll be given two options: ‘Cut’ and ‘Crop’. Once you’ve found the image you want, place it on the page and then select it. If the image was just downloaded you’ll find it in your recent images, otherwise, you’ll need to find it in your folders. Open your GoodNotes app, and then select the ‘picture’ icon. That gives you a lot of flexibility, so you can use your planner in any way you want. This can be any image, from a sticker sheet set to any image that strikes your fancy. Save the image you want to use to your iPad. You can easily crop your own images and make stickers that way. As such, they’ll go into your digital planner without any background overlap, making them easy to use.ĭo you want to use a different image as a planner sticker? The joy of digital planners is that you can make that happen. These formats are good because all stickers will have a transparent background. These stickers come in a PNG or PDF format, typically. There are lots of places where you can purchase a set of digital stickers to use in your planner as and when you want. If you make a purchase through my links, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. ![]() Here’s how you can add digital planner stickers to GoodNotes 5 quickly and easily. There is a better way than adding them one by one using the image tool. However, adding them to GoodNotes can be tiresome. Unlike regular stickers they’re easy to use, can be reused over and over, and you can move them around on the page as needed. Still, I'm more interested in the stars (and the women) than the sparkles.Įdit: I realise that any unresolvable point source of light can only ever be observed as a diffraction pattern.There are lots of benefits to using GoodNotes as a digital planner. I tend to find diffraction spikes distracting, in much the same way that sparkly dresses worn by beautiful women can be distracting. Quite a foreign concept to me.) All I did know was that they are unavoidable with certain telescope constructions, based on the kind of mounting of the secondary mirror or diagonal, or similar. (I hadn't even considered that they might have been added after the fact. ![]() I appreciate all the comments on the diffraction spikes. That said, the saturated (or nearly saturated) stars that show diffraction spikes might be slightly less elongated, suggesting a masking technique that resulted in fewer of them being stacked- not an unreasonable thing to do. Since the diffraction spikes are at 45° to the direction of elongation, we'd expect the broadening to be the same for both axes, meaning there is no simple way to detect it. Perhaps Damian can chip in here with some more technical information about the exposure and processing.Ĭousin Ricky wrote:The big question (the “incongruity”) is why the diffraction spikes are not smeared to the extent that the stars are elongated. My guess is that the tracking was on the stars, and the slight elongation is an artifact of the stacking method used to try and minimize trailing for both the stars and comet at the same time (which isn't something that can be done perfectly). That's more than the slight elongation seen in the stars (which I guess is what you are calling "tracking motion"). That corresponds to about 90 arcseconds of drift of the comet against the background stars, or about 6 pixels when looking at the full-sized image. I didn't find any technical information for this image, but based on other images I assume around a 15-minute total exposure time. The telescope Damian uses has a spider-mounted secondary, so diffraction spikes are normal. I don't think the diffraction spikes are artificial. It seems incongruent that all of the stars have tracking motion but the diffraction spikes are clear and crisp. Geckzilla wrote:I presume the diffraction spikes were added for artistic effect. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |